Skip to main content

J.B. v. State

Citations

  • 849 N.E.2d 714
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 1199
  • 2006 WL 1726514

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that juvenile’s placement in the DOC was warranted after violating probation, committing new offenses, and failing to take advantage of prior opportunities for treatment
  • holding that juvenile’s placement in DOC was warranted after violating probation, committing new offenses, and failing to take advantage of prior opportunities for treatment
  • holding that juvenile’s placement in DOC was warranted after violating probation, committing new offenses, and failing to take advantage of prior opportunities for treatment
  • holding that juvenile’s placement in DOC was warranted after violating probation, committing new offenses, and failing to take advantage of prior opportunities for treatment
  • holding that juvenile’s placement in DOC was warranted after violating probation, committing new offenses, and failing to take advantage of prior opportunities for treatment
  • concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it committed the juvenile to the DOC because the less-restrictive placement suggested by him would have fallen short of meeting the community's safety needs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Friedlander, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.