J&b Entertainment, Inc. v. City of Jackson, Mississippi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the mere incantation of the words ‘secondary effects’ may not save a statute ‘formulated without specific attention to specific secondary effects’ ”
• upholding statute against over-breadth challenge because “although hypothetical examples in which the Ordinance may be overbroad can be imagined, these examples, in comparison to its legitimate sweep, are not substantial”
• “[T]he government must produce evidence that the challenged ordinance may advance its interest in combating adverse secondary effects attendant to nude dancing.”
• “We do not ask whether the regulator subjectively believed or was motivated by other con cerns, but whether an objective lawmaker could have so concluded, supported by an actual basis for the conclusion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).