Jays Foods, L.L.C. v. Chemical & Allied Product Workers Union, Local 20, Afl-Cio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that orders vacating and remanding an award are immediately appealable, though nonfinal
• holding that orders vacating and remanding an award are immediately appealable, though nonfmal
• reasoning that the earlier panel was mistaken “in thinking that the district court’s order of remand was not immediately appealable.”
• reasoning that the earlier panel was mistaken “in thinking that the district court’s order of remand was not immediately appealable.”
• indicating that that jurisdiction is presumably lost on remand unless expressly retained
• explaining that a district court’s order remanding a case to the arbitration panel was not a final, appealable order when “the purpose of the remand was merely to enable the arbitrator to clarify his decision in order to set the stage for informed appellate review.” (internal citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).