Jayel Corp. v. Cochran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that attorney-client relationship between lawyer and landowners satisfied the privity requirement of res judicata
• holding that Arkansas does not require strict privity but only a \substantial identity of the parties\ and thus, the attorney-client relationship is sufficient to establish privity (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that an attorney-client relationship was sufficient to satisfy the privity requirement
• “[T]he attorney-client relationship between the [client] and [lawyer] is sufficient to satisfy the privity requirement for purposes of res judicata.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).