Jayco Systems, Inc. v. Savin Business MacHines Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that standing inquiry turns on whether plaintiff would have been able to enter the market assuming elimination of the anti-competitive obstacle
• explaining that standing inquiry turns on whether plaintiff would have been able to enter the market assuming elimination of the anticompetitive obstacle
• explaining that standing inquiry turns on 13 Case: 14-40854 Document: 00513204331 Page: 14 Date Filed: 09/23/2015 No. 14-40854 whether plaintiff would have been able to enter the market assuming elimination of the anticompetitive obstacle
• noting that the rule denying standing to parties whose “entirely speculative” business plans were thwarted “denies recovery to those persons who . . . could not have suffered injury in fact”
• “Jayco’s failure to show that it could have financed the purchase of the machines convince us that Jayco lacked the preparedness to bid.”
• a bank officer’s affidavit that she would have extended credit to the business did not indicate preparedness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).