District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 7/21/1965
Jay v. Jay
Citations
- 212 A.2d 331
- 1965 D.C. App. LEXIS 221
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Statute providing divorce not effective until six months after date of decree.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hood, Quinn, Myers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Loughran v. LoughranSupreme Court· 1934-04-30· cited 183×
- Cook v. CookD.C. Circuit· 1943-05-17· cited 29×
- Oliver v. OliverD.C. Circuit· 1950-10-23· cited 19×
- Lee v. LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1964-06-26· cited 9×
- Clarence H. Dillard and Gertrude F. Dillard v. Maryland Turner DillardD.C. Circuit· 1960-03-04· cited 8×
- Britt v. BrittDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1959-08-06· cited 6×
- Riedl v. RiedlDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1959-07-21· cited 4×
- Morse v. MorseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1964-05-14· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.