Jay Preston v. Wisconsin Health Fund, Bruce Trojak, and Linda Hamilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in a case involving a male discriminating against another male in favor of a woman, such facts would provide the necessary background circumstances
• explaining that “situations have been identified” where companies “are under pressure from affirmative action plans”
• “Neither in purpose nor iii consequence can favoritism resulting from a personal relationship be equated' to sex discrimination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).