Jay Outlaw v. The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that once a duty to warn is established, the adequacy of the warning is usually a question for the jury
• holding that once a duty to warn is established, the adequacy of the warning is usually a question for the jury
• holding that once a duty to warn is established, the adequacy of the warning is usually a question for the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).