Jay Hiatt v. Mazda Motor Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining “in a suit based on diversity of citizenship jurisdiction the federal courts apply federal law as to matters of procedure but the substantive law of the relevant state”
• “[F]ederal court must apply a Federal Rule to a matter within its scope even where it differs from a state rule and could lead to a different outcome.”
• we apply state substantive law and federal procedural law in diversity cases
• “The [Supreme] Court has stressed that federal courts must apply a Federal Rule to a matter within its scope even where it . . . could lead to a different outcome [in state court].” (citing Burlington N. R.R., 480 U.S. at 6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• James Bradshaw v. FFE Transportation Services, I
  Eighth Circuit· 2013-06-03· cited 24×
• Kristin Smith v. Toyota Motor Corporation
  Eighth Circuit· 2020-07-07· cited 14×
• Timothy Farkas v. Addition Mfg. Technologies
  Eighth Circuit· 2020-03-11· cited 5×
• Unity Healthcare, Inc. v. County of Hennepin
  D. Minnesota· 2015-06-25· cited 4×
• Pitts v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
  E.D. Missouri· 2017-03-31· cited 1×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1996-01-30
• JN Exploration & v. Western Gas Res.
  Eighth Circuit· 1998-09-01
• David Allen Archer v. Pavement Specialist
  Eighth Circuit· 2002-01-30
• Rodenburg LLP v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
  Eighth Circuit· 2021-08-25
• Farb v. Perez-Riera
  D. Puerto Rico· 2013-05-15

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Erie Railroad v. Tompkins
  Supreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
• Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-20· cited 3,025×
• Hanna v. Plumer
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 2,853×
• Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 2,475×
• Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-02· cited 848×
• Burlington Northern Railroad v. Woods
  Supreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 373×
• Larson MacHine, Inc. v. Wallace
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1980-04-28· cited 82×
• Chapman Chemical Co. v. Taylor
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1949-06-27· cited 67×
• Riddell v. Little
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1972-12-18· cited 35×
• Monarch Industrial Corp. v. American Motorists Insurance
  S.D. New York· 1967-10-16· cited 32×
• Thompson v. Cranston
  W.D. New York· 1942-02-16· cited 22×
• Thurman Brown v. E.W. Bliss Co., E.W. Bliss Co., Inc., and W.H.B. Co., Inc.
  Eighth Circuit· 1987-05-26· cited 13×
• Booth Ex Rel. Booth v. United States Industries, Inc.
  W.D. Arkansas· 1984-04-26· cited 5×
• Bonds v. Snapper Power Equipment Co.
  Eighth Circuit· 1991-06-21· cited 4×