Skip to main content
· 6/22/2010

Jay E. Hayden Foundation v. First Neighbor Bank, N.A.

Citations

  • 610 F.3d 382
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 12773
  • 2010 WL 2485678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a RICO offense “is using an enterprise to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity”
  • explaining that “if it is plain from the complaint that the [statute of limitations] defense is indeed a bar to the suit dismissal is proper without further pleading.”
  • discussing how even if an enterprise existed, the complaint must alleged the enterprise was used
  • “[I]f it is plain from the complaint that the [statute of limitations] defense is indeed a bar to the suit dismissal is proper without further pleading.”
  • “[I]f it is plain from the complaint that the [statute of limitations] defense is indeed a bar to the suit dismissal is proper without further pleading.” (cleaned up)
  • 4-year limitations period for civil RICO claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Rovner, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.