Skip to main content
· 7/26/2010

Jay Dee/Mole Joint Venture v. Mayor & City Council

Citations

  • 725 F. Supp. 2d 513
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142131
  • 2010 WL 2948193

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a “material breach . . . affects the purpose of the contract in an important or vital way.”
  • noting that a material breach “discharges the non-breaching party of its duty to perform”
  • “Where the contract itself is clear in making a certain event a material breach of that contract, a court must ordinarily respect that contractual provision.”
  • although “the City ha[d] not proved, nor really attempted to prove, that it suffered damages as a result of th[e] breach,” it was nonetheless entitled to nominal damages (citing Taylor, 776 A.2d at 651.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: J. Frederick Motz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.