Skip to main content
· 10/31/1995

Javetz v. Board of Control, Grand Valley State University

Citations

  • 903 F. Supp. 1181
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16301
  • 1995 WL 646368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that additional evidence should only be considered under a Rule 59(e) motion if, in the exercise of all diligence, it could not have been submitted before its current submission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKEAGUE

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.