Skip to main content
· 7/26/1996

Javed v. Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor Vehicles

Citations

  • 921 P.2d 620
  • 1996 Alas. LEXIS 74
  • 1996 WL 417634

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that statute prohibiting accused in license revocation hearing from introducing evidence that he was not driving at time of arrest violated due process as applied to accused and others like him
  • considering what issues are of \central importance\ to be determined prior to a driver’s license revocation
  • considering what issues are of \central importance\ to be determined prior to a driver's license revocation
  • noting statute contains \very precise limiting language for the issues that are to be considered\
  • \A driver's license represents an important property interest which is protected under the due process clause of the Alaska Constitution.\
  • \A driver's license represents an important property interest which is protected under the due process clause of the Alaska Constitution.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Compton, Rabinowitz, Matthews, Eastaugh, Carpeneti, Tern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.