Skip to main content
· 1/3/2005

Jaufre Ex Rel. Jaufre v. Taylor

Citations

  • 351 F. Supp. 2d 514
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2872
  • 2005 WL 19278

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Courts have recognized that the privacy of children may constitute a compelling interest that outweighs the presumption in favor of public access.”
  • “Courts have recognized that the privacy of children may constitute a compelling interest that outweighs the presumption in favor of public access.”
  • “Courts have recognized that the privacy of children may constitute a compelling interest that outweighs the presumption in favor of public access.”
  • denying joint motion to seal court record
  • denying joint motion to seal court record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vance

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.