Jatar v. Lamaletto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• specifying that while “[s]ociety is willing to recognize a reasonable expectation of privacy in conversations in a private home ... [,] this recognition does not necessarily extend to conversations conducted in a business office”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Center for Medical Progress
  N.D. California· 2016-09-30· cited 9×
• Cohen Brothers, LLC. v. Me Corp., Sa
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-14· cited 7×
• Avrich v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-23· cited 4×
• McDade v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-07· cited 3×
• Brugmann v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-12· cited 3×
• State v. Caraballo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-03-09
• Corey Smiley v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-08-16

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Inciarrano
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-06-27· cited 45×
• State v. Walls
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1978-03-02· cited 18×
• Morales v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-09-08· cited 3×