Skip to main content
· 11/2/2011

Jasso v. CAMAS COUNTY

Citations

  • 264 P.3d 897
  • 151 Idaho 790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the failure to provide a decision that facilitates judicial review violates a party’s substantial right to due process
  • reaffirming that reliance on magic words is not required; rather, all that is required for adequate judicial review is that the record reflect the basis of the position taken below, in that case of the factual basis for the decision-making body’s conclusions
  • discussing Evans v. Teton Cnty., 139 Idaho 71, 73 P.3d 84 (2003)
  • We will not “scour the record for evidence which may support the decision-maker’s implied findings and legal conclusions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horton, Burdick, Eismann, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.