Skip to main content
· 3/13/1992

Jasper v. Zara

Citations

  • 595 So. 2d 1075
  • 1992 WL 45704

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no personal jurisdiction where the plaintiff initially solicited the defendant in New York by phone and the defendant subsequently communicated with the plaintiff and his accountant by telephone and letter over a period of 18 months
  • no personal jurisdiction where the plaintiff initially solicited the defendant in New York by phone and the defendant subsequently communicated with the plaintiff and his accountant by telephone and letter over a period of 18 months
  • finding no personal jurisdiction under subsections (l)(a), (l)(g) or (2
  • involving communications by mail and telephone

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Danahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.