Skip to main content
· 6/13/1988

Jasper v. Blackburn

Citations

  • 687 F. Supp. 263
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6038
  • 1988 WL 63624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing erroneous judgments subject to attack through direct appeals from void judgments subject to attack through Rule 60(b)(4)
  • distinguishing erroneous judgments subject to attack through direct appeals from void judgments subject to attack through Rule 60(b)(4)
  • “[I]f a judgment is void, it is a nullity from the outset and any 60(b)(4) motion for relief is therefore filed within a reasonable time.”
  • “Even if the parties’ consent decree does technically run afoul of federal patent law principles, the problem would be one of relief from an erroneous judgment, not a void one. The district court had requisite jurisdiction over the parties and over the subject matter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.