· 6/13/1988
Jasper v. Blackburn
Citations
- 687 F. Supp. 263
- 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6038
- 1988 WL 63624
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing erroneous judgments subject to attack through direct appeals from void judgments subject to attack through Rule 60(b)(4)
- distinguishing erroneous judgments subject to attack through direct appeals from void judgments subject to attack through Rule 60(b)(4)
- “[I]f a judgment is void, it is a nullity from the outset and any 60(b)(4) motion for relief is therefore filed within a reasonable time.”
- “Even if the parties’ consent decree does technically run afoul of federal patent law principles, the problem would be one of relief from an erroneous judgment, not a void one. The district court had requisite jurisdiction over the parties and over the subject matter.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feldman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.