Skip to main content
· 7/8/2011

Jasper v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.

Citations

  • 834 F. Supp. 2d 766
  • 2011 WL 2672519
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73806

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the statutory immunity analysis is “a necessarily fact intensive inquiry that may be inappropriate to address on a motion to dismiss”
  • finding that plaintiff failed to plead that medical care was not provided in a reasonable amount of time where she “d[id] not allege how long she spent in custody” before she was released and taken to a hospital
  • dismissing claim of assault where plaintiff failed to allege the “’definitive act’ of the tort…such as a statement or threat, by [defendant]… that placed her in fear of harmful contact.”
  • objectively reasonable for officer to seize and detain uncooperative individual at scene of burglary, “in order to prevent further harm to her or anyone else”
  • “R.C. 2744.07(A)(2) does not provide Shoup with a cause of action against the City or anyone; it imposes a duty on the City to defend its employees from her claims.”
  • \ R.C. 2744.07(A)(2) does not provide Shoup with a cause of action against the City or anyone; it imposes a duty on the City to defend its employees from her claims.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kendall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.