Jaspan Schlesinger, LLP v. Neuberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[s]ubsection (a)(2)” of the terrorism exception “contains three collateral requirements,” including that “that the foreign state was designated as a state sponsor of terrorism”
• suggesting that injured plaintiff's ability to sue for act of extrajudicial killing depends on whether someone else was killed
• noting that “Sudan’s council conceded, ‘there’s no dispute about service being proper’ ”
• explaining that the burden of production in administrative law “is the amount of evidence constituting enough to justify, if the trial were to a jury, a refusal to direct a verdict ...” (quoting Kay v. FCC, 396 F.3d 1184, 1188 (D.C. Cir. 2005))
• doubting whether punitive damages apply retroactively but declining to vacate award
• denying relief because the movant “ha[d] not identified clear or obvious errors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).