Jason Richard Baumann v. Sara Cardona Agudelo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a ruling is not appealed, it “will normally be regarded as law of the case and binding upon the parties”
• holding that “[m]ilitary judges are presumed to know the law and to follow it absent clear evidence to the contrary”
• holding that “[m]ilitary judges are presumed to know the law and to follow it absent clear evidence to the contrary”
• holding that an appellant must prove not only that there was error but also that it was plain or obvious and materially prejudicial to a substantial right
• noting that “[m]ilitary judges are presumed to know the law and to follow it absent clear evidence to the contrary”
• presuming that a military judge is able to distinguish between proper and improper sentencing argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).