Jason James Robinson v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that the fact that Congress “left completely untouched” language from an earlier statute was some evidence that the administrative interpretation of the language was the one Congress intended
• noting that statutes affecting, foreign relations often “leave the exercise of power to - [the President’s] unrestricted judgment,” but that does not mean that the President has “totally unrestricted freedom of choice”
• sustaining Government refusal to validate passports to Cuba even though that restriction \rendered less than wholly free the flow of information concerning that country\
• sustaining Government refusal to validate passports to Cuba even though that restriction “rendered less than wholly free the flow of information concerning that country”
• rejecting appellant’s contention that “a First Amendment right ... is involved” in government’s denial of right to travel to Cuba
• rejecting appellant's contention that \a First Amendment right ... is involved\ in government's denial of right to travel to Cuba

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).