Jasinski v. City of Miami

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiffs purported right to refund of improperly enacted administrative charge was based on a mere expectation that the state of the law prior to the enactment of an ordinance ratifying the fee would continue — not a vested right to a refund of the administrative fee
• retroactively applying curative ordinance when failing to do so would place the individuals' interest in benefitting from the City’s mistake before the public interest in the government’s proper administration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).