Jas. H. Forbes Tea & Coffee Co. v. Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a university had a compelling interest in the “health and well-being of its students”
• applying RFRA upon an alleged violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment
• challenging party must demonstrate that discovery rulings resulted in actual and substantial prejudice to that party
• “Public health and well-being have been recognized as compelling governmental interests in a variety of contexts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).