Jarvis v. Village Gun Shop, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a reasonable reinvestigation “does not require [consumer reporting agencies] to resolve legal disputes about the validity of the underlying debts they report”
• finding that expert testimony grounded in accepted scientific literature was a permissible showing of reliable methodology
• summarizing rare circumstances where individuals other than government employees may be sued under § 1983
• summarizing rare circumstances where individuals other than government employees may be sued under § 1983
• finding sufficiently reliable methodology where the expert based his opinion on valid and accepted sources
• allowing expert testimony that relied on “published sources generally accepted” by the medical community

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).