Jarvis v. FHP of Utah, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant’s motion to dismiss filed in the district court did not sufficiently manifest consent to removal
• “each party must independently and unambiguously file notice of their consent and intent to join in the removal within the thirty-day period allowed.”
• “[A]lthough all defendants need not sign the same notice of removal, each party must independently and unambiguously file notice of their consent and intent to join in the removal within the thirty day period allowed.”
• “There is nothing unfair about requiring each defendant to either sign the notice of removal, file its own notice of removal, or file a written consent or written joinder to the original notice of removal.”
• filing motion to dismiss not unambiguous consent to removal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).