· 5/5/2006
Jarvis v. Ensminger
Citations
- 134 P.3d 353
- 24 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 947
- 2006 Alas. LEXIS 66
- 2006 WL 1195677
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that subjective statement of party's intentions or understandings was \not sufficient to demonstrate a factual dispute over the meaning of the contract\
- considering whether provision was condition precedent or timing mechanism
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bryner, Matthews, Eastaugh, Fabe, Carpeneti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.