Jarrod Dale Young v. Kathryn Renee Terral

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s Title VII disparate pay claim must fail where she failed to identify that she was paid less than a proffered comparator, not in her protected class, for work requiring substantially the same responsibility
• considering job responsibilities and qualifications and 3 He also served as a research advisor for Alliance. 8 discounting the job titles in determining whether employees had been similarly situated
• finding direct evidence when employers said an employee was “too black to do various tasks” or explicitly refused to “hire a black person”
• analyzing LEDL and Title VII claims together under the Title VII analysis because the LE DL and Title VII are “substantively similar”
• rejecting plaintiff’s proffered comparators because they “were called on to do more than” plaintiff and “had greater qualifications and responsibilities” than plaintiff
• “A variety of factors are considered when determining whether a comparator is similarly situated, including job responsibility, experience, and qualifications.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).