Jarris R. Hammons v. International Playtex, Inc., a Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that the 60 days under Rule 3 was an “integral part of the statute of limitations” and any enlargement would frustrate its policies
• reasoning that the 60 days under Rule 3 was an “integral part of the statute of limitations” and any enlargement would frustrate its policies
• noting that the 60 days under Rule 3 was an “integral part of the statute of limitations” and any enlargement would frustrate its policies
• noting that the 60 days under Rule 3 was an “integral part of the statute of limitations” and any enlargement would frustrate its policies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).