Jarrett v. Town of Yarmouth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “there is no case that has held [bite and hold] policies to be unconstitutional”
• discussing K-9 bite case law in context of qualified immunity, and observing that “there is no case that has held [“bite and hold”] policies to be unconstitutional”
• discussing K-9 bite case law in context of qualified immunity, and observing that “there is no case that has held [“bite and hold”] policies to be unconstitutional”
• characterizing relevant inquiry as “whether a reasonable . officer would have believed that releasing a trained police dog to apprehend [defendant] was lawful in light of both clearly established law and the particular circumstances of that night”
• characterizing relevant inquiry as “whether a reasonable officer would have believed that releasing a trained police dog to apprehend [defendant] was lawful in light of both clearly established law and the particular circumstances of that night”
• characterizing relevant inquiry as “whether a reasonable officer would have believed that releasing a trained police dog to apprehend [defendant] was lawful in light of both clearly established law and the particular circumstances of that night”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).