Jarrell v. State Road Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an EFT while it takes the form of a bank credit at an intermediary bank is clearly a seizable res under the forfeiture statutes”
• noting that \at this stage in the development of forfeiture law\ much needed revisions \must come either from the Supreme Court or from congress.\
• stating that “the fourth amendment mandates the existence of probable cause at the time of seizure”
• stating that a challenge, such as a motion to suppress, would require the government to show probable cause for the seizure
• reconciling previous decisions regarding the level above mere suspicion to which probable cause must rise
• reconciling previous decisions regarding the level above mere suspicion to which probable cause must rise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).