Jarreau v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming defendant’s conviction for incest based upon the victim testimony that she and her step-father had sexual intercourse
• in ruling on a motion to quash a subpoena, the trial court has wide discretion in determining whether evidence is relevant
• force element of rape was shown where defendant had sexually assaulted his stepdaughter repeatedly when she was a child
• victim minor when numerous incidents of rape occurred and it cannot be determined from opinion if rape conviction related to rape that occurred after victim turned 18
• victim minor when numerous incidents of rape occurred and it cannot be determined from opinion if rape conviction related to rape that occurred after victim turned 18
• testimony of incest victim sufficient to establish a fact, even if uncorroborated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).