Jarrard v. Seifert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that professional engineers and land surveyors breached their duty to act with reasonable diligence, skill and ability by failing to search for existing easements on a property because it is common practice for these types of professionals to do so
• holding that professional engineers and land surveyors breached their duty to act with reasonable diligence, skill and ability by failing to search for existing easements on a property because it is common practice for these types of professionals to do so
• engineers undertaking engineering services in this state have a common law duty of reasonable care
• developers “entitled to rely” on superi- or knowledge of architects and surveyors “and to expect that [they will] fulfill the duty of reasonable diligence, skill, and ability”
• engineers undertaking engineering services in this state have a common law duty of reasonable care

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).