Jaron v. Jaron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “applications for adjustment of status that could not be simultaneously filed because to file for third-preference status required prior approval by the United States Department of Labor of labor certification”
• noting that, although there are now statutory provisions governing motions to reopen filed in removal proceedings, the regulations provide the sole time limitations on filing motions to reopen in deportation proceedings
• explaining that \applications for adjustment of status that could not be simultaneously filed because to file for third-preference status required prior approval by the United States Department of Labor of labor certification\
• noting the IJ’s lack of jurisdiction to assess the evidence submitted in support of a visa petition
• noting the Board’s lack of jurisdiction to assess the evidence submitted in support of a visa petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).