Skip to main content
· 1/16/1997

Jarman v. City of Northlake

Citations

  • 950 F. Supp. 1375
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 674
  • 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,744
  • 79 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1095
  • 1997 WL 18329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a “five-month delay is clearly long enough to prevent [the defendant’s] response from being characterized as immediate”
  • applying EEOC guideline and concluding that city could be liable for alderman’s harassment of deputy clerk
  • determining there would be no First Amendment bar for a City employer to ban sexual harassment in the workplace when evaluating a hostile environment claim
  • city had sufficient control over harassing non-employee alderman to require intervention and interventions were not sufficiently immediate
  • five-month delay before employer took any corrective measure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aspen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.