Jared Levi Coleman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deferring to the trial court’s determination of credibility and demeanor and concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by finding the appellant’s statement voluntary when there was no evidence to support the appellant’s allegation of a promise
• “For expert testimony to be admissible under this rule, the party offering scientific expert testimony must demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that this testimony is sufficiently reliable and relevant to assist the factfinder in reaching accurate results.”
• “For expert testimony to be admissible under this rule, the party offering scientific expert testimony must demonstrate, by clear and convincing evidence, that this testimony is sufficiently reliable and relevant to assist the factfinder in reaching accurate results.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).