Jared Beatty v. Olin Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “argument is insufficient to avoid summary judgment; the nonmoving party needs to come forward with evidence” (emphasis in original)
• explaining that “argument is insufficient to avoid summary judgment; the nonmoving party needs to come forward with evidence” (emphasis in original)
• noting that “argument is insufficient to avoid summary judgment; the nonmoving party needs to come forward with evidence.” (emphasis in original)
• noting that the nonmoving party “needs to come forward with evidence” demonstrating her entitlement to relief sufficient to “support a jury’s verdict in [her] favor”; Cooper v. Haw, 803 F. App’x 942, 946 (7th Cir. 2020
• “[T]he nonmoving party needs to come forward with evidence.” (emphasis in original)
• “[T]he nonmoving party needs to come forward with evidence.” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).