Skip to main content
· 2/15/2001

Jarecki v. Shung Moo Louie

Citations

  • 745 N.E.2d 1006
  • 95 N.Y.2d 665
  • 722 N.Y.S.2d 784
  • 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating a merger clause applies “the parol evidence rule in order to bar the introduction of extrinsic evidence to alter, vary or contradict the terms of the writing”
  • “The purpose of a merger clause is ... to bar the introduction of extrinsic evidence to alter, vary or contradict the terms of the writing.”
  • “The purpose of a merger clause is to require the full application of the parol evidence rule in order to bar the introduction of extrinsic evidence to alter, vary or contradict the terms of the writing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wesley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.