Jardine v. Rubloff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “owners of buildings with elevators are viewed as common carriers who owe their passengers the highest degree of care”
• explaining that jury finding of negligence by the common carrier but not the other party could be explained by the difference in duty—the common carrier had nondelegable duty to exercise highest care, whereas the other party had to exercise only ordinary care
• “[Ojwners of buildings with elevators are viewed as common carriers who owe their passengers the highest degree of care----”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).