Skip to main content
· 2/25/1916

Jarboe's Administrator v. Coleman

Citations

  • 168 Ky. 707
  • 182 S.W. 922
  • 1916 Ky. LEXIS 616

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Holding a defendant’s exhaustion defense does not apply to a plaintiff’s retaliation claim because by definition, retaliation claims arise after filing an EEOC charge.
  • considering EEOC letter of determination that was attached to the defendant’s motion to dismiss
  • granting motion to dismiss plaintiff’s discriminatory termination claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies because it was distinct from his claims that the defendant discriminated against him by disciplining him and denying him income opportunities
  • “Defendant’s exhaustion defense therefore does not apply to Plaintiff’s retaliation claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Settle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.