Skip to main content
· 3/9/1992

Jarboe v. United States Small Business Administration (In Re Hancock)

Citations

  • 137 B.R. 835
  • 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 349
  • 1992 WL 45564

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that it is idle to pretend that Federal government agencies are not the same
  • lengthy discussion of origin and principles of setoff, relevance of third parties’ rights and mutuality requirement as applied to different governmental agencies
  • court may compel trustee to prosecute or re-vest claim in debtor where trustee refuses to act
  • “This Court believes itself bound by [United States] Supreme Court precedent and by bankruptcy statute, legislative intent and policy to take into account the interests of all creditors, not just of the one claiming setoff”
  • the SBA and the IRS different entities for setoff purposes
  • “Where there is payment, by definition there is no setoff.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mickey Dan Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.