Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 11/19/1965
Jarboe v. Harting
Citations
- 397 S.W.2d 775
- 1965 Ky. LEXIS 84
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where the common knowledge or experience of laymen jurors is extensive enough to recognize or infer medical negligence from the circumstances then an expert witness is not necessary
- holding that where the common knowledge or experience of laymen jurors is extensive enough to recognize or infer medical negligence from the circumstances then an expert witness is not necessary
- doctor misdiagnosed pregnant patient as having a uterine tumor and failed to perform pregnancy test before surgery — doctor admitted he should have performed the pregnancy test
- doctor misdiagnosed pregnant patient as having a uterine tumor and failed to perform pregnancy test before surgery doctor admitted he should have performed the pregnancy test
- “[W]e recognize[] the rule that ordinarily expert evidence is necessary to support the conclusion of causation.”
- “[W]e recognize[] the rule that ordinarily expert evidence is necessary to support the conclusion of causation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cullen, Stewart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nellie F. Welsh, Administratrix of the Estate of Francis John Welsh, Deceased, and Nellie Welsh, Individually v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1988-06-07· cited 170×
- Deutsch v. SheinKentucky Supreme Court· 1980-03-11· cited 162×
- Carl L. Vance, by and Through His Attorney in Fact, Debra Vance Hammons v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1996-07-25· cited 121×
- Perkins v. HausladenKentucky Supreme Court· 1992-04-09· cited 112×
- Baptist Healthcare Systems, Inc. v. MillerKentucky Supreme Court· 2005-08-25· cited 68×
- Blair v. EblenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1970-12-18· cited 65×
- Brown v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2016-11-18· cited 50×
- Baylis v. Lourdes Hospital, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court· 1991-03-14· cited 45×
- Ward v. HousmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1991-06-07· cited 45×
- Green v. LilliewoodSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-12-11· cited 41×
- Walden v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1968-11-22· cited 39×
- Maggard v. McKelveyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1981-10-30· cited 28×
- Morris v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1977-03-04· cited 28×
- Robertson v. LaCroixCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 1975-04-17· cited 27×
- Mellies v. National Heritage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1981-11-25· cited 27×
- McNeill v. United StatesD. South Carolina· 1981-06-24· cited 27×
- Haney v. DeSandreSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1985-06-17· cited 25×
- Meiman v. Rehabilitation Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1969-05-30· cited 24×
- Maxwell v. Women's Clinic, P.A.Idaho Supreme Court· 1981-03-18· cited 22×
- Cox Ex Rel. Estate of Cox v. LundSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-08-08· cited 22×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Johnson v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1963-06-07· cited 69×
- Butts v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1956-03-02· cited 32×
- Wickoff v. JamesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1958-04-24· cited 30×
- Sheffield v. RunnerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1958-08-19· cited 22×
- Kelly Contracting Company v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1964-02-07· cited 18×
- Greenwood v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1961-03-14· cited 17×
- Engle v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1961-04-28· cited 13×
- Consolidated Coach Corporation v. GarmonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1930-03-18· cited 13×
- Cumberland Railroad v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1913-12-03· cited 8×
- Bir v. FosterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1960-08-31· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.