Jaramillo v. Colorado Judicial Department

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs bear the' burden of showing that “each reason given by the employer is unworthy of credence”
• concluding that because a state agency’s rules did not require the administration of a formal examination, its failure to do so was not a “procedural irregularity” that could support an inference of pretext
• holding “minor differences between [an employee’s] qualifications and those of a successful applicant are not sufficient to show pretext”
• noting that “the mere fact that the [employer] has offered different explanations for its decision does not create a genuine question of pre- text”
• noting that “the mere fact that the [employer] has offered different explanations for its decision does not create a genuine question of pre- text”
• finding that an employer articulated a non-discriminatory reason for not promoting an employee when it specified the superior qualifications of the em- ployee who was promoted instead

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).