Eighth Circuit· 6/27/1995
Jaramillo v. Burkhart
Citations
- 59 F.3d 78
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that, “unlike a dismissal without prejudice, a dismissal with prejudice operates as a rejection of the plaintiff’s claims on the merits”
- “[D]ismissal with prejudice operates as a rejection of the plaintiff’s claims on the merits and res judicata precludes further litigation.”
- standard of review; dismissal with prejudice operates as rejection of plaintiff’s claims on merits
- “Under the law of the case doctrine, a district court must follow our mandate, and we retain the authority to decide whether the district court scrupulously and fully carried out our mandate’s terms.”
- “When a plaintiff requests dismissal without prejudice and the district court intends to dismiss with prejudice, ... the district court must give the plaintiff notice of its intention and a chance to withdraw the request and proceed with litigation.”
- dismissal with prejudice operates as rejection of plaintiff’s claims on merits
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fagg, Hansen, McMillian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Belizan, Monica v. Hershon, SimonD.C. Circuit· 2006-01-17· cited 173×
- United States v. Thomas Chisolm BartshEighth Circuit· 1995-11-06· cited 122×
- Elbaor v. Tripath Imaging, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2002-01-14· cited 115×
- United States ex rel. Stone v. Rockwell International Corp.Tenth Circuit· 2002-03-04· cited 62×
- Bob Klein v. Arkoma Production CompanyEighth Circuit· 1996-03-04· cited 58×
- Unnamed caseEighth Circuit· 2005-09-07· cited 30×
- Robert Morrow v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 2022-08-30· cited 27×
- United States v. PepperEighth Circuit· 2009-07-02· cited 21×
- Rod Marshall v. Anderson Excavating & WreckingEighth Circuit· 2021-08-06· cited 21×
- Eadie v. Leise PropertiesNebraska Supreme Court· 2018-06-01· cited 20×
- Diane Graham v. Mentor WorldwideEighth Circuit· 2021-05-25· cited 20×
- United States v. One Tract Of Real PropertySixth Circuit· 1996-09-10· cited 14×
- United States v. Rockwell International Corp.Tenth Circuit· 2002-03-04· cited 8×
- N.S. Ex Rel. S.S. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2017-09-28· cited 8×
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Concrete Holding Co.Eighth Circuit· 1999-02-10· cited 8×
- Environmental Dynamics, Inc. v. Robert Tyer & Associates, Inc.N.D. Iowa· 1996-06-21· cited 6×
- Jiricko v. Moser & Marsalek, P.C.E.D. Missouri· 1999-03-01· cited 6×
- Abels v. Titan International, Inc.S.D. Iowa· 2000-01-31· cited 5×
- H & H Network Services, Inc. v. Unicity International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah· 2014-04-03· cited 5×
- United States v. One Tract of Real Property Together with All Buildings, Improvements, Appurtenances, & FixturesSixth Circuit· 1996-09-10· cited 5×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- S.A. Andes v. Versant Corporation, and First Washington Investments Corporation and Thomas F. HerrFirst Circuit· 1986-04-22· cited 150×
- Robert H. Gravatt v. Columbia UniversitySecond Circuit· 1988-04-22· cited 45×
- In Re Ivan F. Boesky Securities LitigationSecond Circuit· 1992-02-25· cited 33×
- Jaramillo v. BurkhartEighth Circuit· 1993-07-26· cited 32×
- Jay Moser and Dana Moser v. Universal Engineering CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1994-01-19· cited 22×
- Shinrone, Inc. And Frances G. Bridge, Cross-Appellants v. Insurance Company of North America, Cross-AppelleeEighth Circuit· 1978-02-07· cited 9×
- Jaramillo (Bienvenida) v. Burkhart (Joseph)Eighth Circuit· 1991-11-27· cited 4×
Other cases named Jaramillo v. Burkhart
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.