Skip to main content
· 6/12/2012

Jaramillo v. Adams County School District 14

Citations

  • 680 F.3d 1267
  • 2012 WL 2108170
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 11910
  • 95 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,526
  • 115 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that although courts must “construe the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-movant, to avoid summary judgment, a nonmovant must provide significantly probative evidence that would support a verdict in [its] favor”
  • stating the moving party must provide “significantly probative evidence” that would support a verdict in its favor and that “facts must be identified by reference to affidavits, deposition transcripts, or specific exhibits incorporated therein.”
  • “Courts are understandably reluctant to allow theories of institutional racism to displace the requirement of personal knowledge of facts concerning adverse employment actions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Brorby, O'Brien

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.