JarAllah v. Schoen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in ruling upon summary judgment motion instead of granting continuance when appellant “did not demonstrate that a continuance would lead to the discovery of relevant evidence”
• the comments-of-counsel privilege (OCGA § 51-5-7 (7)) is conditional and must be made in good faith and is waived by actual malice
• listing elements for fraud in Georgia

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).