Skip to main content
· 6/28/1994

J.A.R. v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 877 P.2d 1323
  • 179 Ariz. 267
  • 168 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 32
  • 1994 Ariz. App. LEXIS 129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • identifying need for independent counsel in a hotly contested custody dispute because of strong interest of child
  • identifying need for independent counsel in a hotly contested custody dispute because of strong interest of child
  • special action jurisdiction covers both nonappealable orders and appeal-able orders when remedy by appeal inadequate
  • “a mental health professional * * * simply cannot assure that * * * all relevant information is properly investigated and introduced in an admissible fashion at trial, or that irrelevant or biased information is either kept out or cross-examined.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobson, Noyes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.