Jaqua v. Nike, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court erred by granting a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim for breach of an implied-in-fact contract where the defendant’s conduct gave rise to an inference that it had agreed to compensate the plaintiff
• defining the elements as “a benefit conferred, awareness by the recipient that a benefit has been received and, under the circumstances, it would be unjust to allow retention of the benefit without requiring the recipient to pay for it”
• plaintiff provided defendant with an idea for a new shoe
• discussing the elements necessary to find a quasi-contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).