Skip to main content
· 7/20/1989

Japax, Inc. v. Sodick Company Limited

Citations

  • 542 N.E.2d 792
  • 186 Ill. App. 3d 656
  • 134 Ill. Dec. 446
  • 1989 Ill. App. LEXIS 1105
  • 1989 WL 83435

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that aben parent “had more than mere knowledge that its products likely would end up in Illinois”
  • finding jurisdiction over Japanese parent which had “some control” over U.S. subsidiary, “or at least maintain[ed] significant connections with it in order to facilitate the sales and servicing of its systems.”
  • where Japanese manufacturer’s products came into Illinois as part of plan to sell regularly in Illinois, manufacturer was “doing business” in Illinois even though products leaving Japanese plant were initially sold in Japan to intermediaries who sold products in United States
  • where Japanese manufacturer's products came into Illinois as part of plan to sell regularly in Illinois, manufacturer was \doing business\ in Illinois even though products leaving Japanese plant were initially sold in Japan to intermediaries who sold products in United States

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Linn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.