· 2/13/2007
J.A.O. Acquisition Corp. v. Stavitsky
Citations
- 863 N.E.2d 585
- 8 N.Y.3d 144
- 831 N.Y.S.2d 364
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing negligent misrepresentation claim because there was no evidence that plaintiff relied on defendant’s statements in making its decision to purchase stock
- negligent misrepresentation requires “a duty on the defendant to impart correct information to the plaintiff” and “that the information was incorrect”
- “[U]nder New York law a cause of action for negligent misrepresentation can be maintained only when the plaintiff himself or herself relies on statements made by the defendant.” (emphasis in original)
- “It is settled New York law that the elements of negligent misrepresentation are: (1) carelessness in imparting words; (2) upon which others were expected to rely; (3
- “A claim for negligent misrepresentation requires the plaintiff to demonstrate (1) the existence of a special or privity-like relationship imposing a duty on the defendant to impart correct information to the plaintiff; (2
- “[U]nder New York law a cause of action for negligent misrepresentation can be maintained only when the plaintiff himself or herself relies on statements made by the defendant.” (emphasis in original)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Graffeo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.